
One of the most common and unintended mistakes made by good-intentioned, yet naive, eco-enthusiasts is in their assumption that a product or process derived from a plant source is always sustainable and a better choice for the environment. While often times plant-derived products are, by comparison, more environmentally friendly than their synthetic counterparts (corn plastic vs. typical plastic for example), they can also have many negative environmental characteristics and indirect effects as well (water consumption, synthetic fertilizer and toxic pesticide usage, food price inflation, etc. in the case of corn growing). These negative environmental aspects to some ‘green products’, whether apparent or somewhat obscure, are almost always known by the companies producing them. But like any good ‘environmental optimist’ (wink), these companies usually try to focus on the positive aspects of their supposed ‘eco-friendly’ products.
The Anatomy Of A Greenwash
Of course “focus” to most means to emphasize, but to many companies trying to jump on the green product money train, “focus” means bury the negative and just market the positive. So what if there are no real or substantial environmentally positive aspects to a company’s ‘green’ product; what then? Well, make up some positive green claims and no one will ever know the difference right? Wrong.
Though greenwashing is still rampant in the marketplace, it often times is so ridiculous and overtly obvious, that even the most remotely environmentally aware consumer can usually call BS on a ‘green claim’ that just isn’t true. However, there a few companies and products out there who make a concerted effort to be more than just obscure about their products’ environmentally beneficial claims and when this occurs, it’s the task of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to take notice and respond.
Bamboo Isn’t As Green As Some Companies Lead You To Believe
Bamboo-based products have become all the rage in the green marketplace due to bamboo’s rapidly renewable nature as well its ability to be manufactured into all sorts of different types of products and materials. No where has there been a bigger increase in the manufacture and sale of bamboo-based products than in the textile industry. Bamboo sheets, towels, shirts, rugs, and virtually any other fabric type product are mainstays of any green housewares store and have even begun showing up at places like Target and Walmart.
Though the rapidly renewable nature of bamboo does give some green credentials to bamboo-based textile products, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said Tuesday that any other environmental claims made about bamboo-based textile products are essentially outright lies. The FTC focused specifically on four companies (Pure Bamboo, Bamboosa, Jonano, and Mad Mod) who actively marketed their products as being “made in an environmentally friendly manner, naturally antimicrobial, and biodegradable”. The FTC release reads as follows:
The companies falsely claim that their rayon clothing and other textile products are “100% bamboo fiber.” They market them under such names as “ecoKashmere,” “Pure Bamboo,” “Bamboo Comfort,” and “BambooBaby.” Rayon is a man-made fiber created from the cellulose found in plants and trees and processed with a harsh toxic chemical that releases hazardous air pollutants. Any plant or tree could be used as the cellulose source – including bamboo – but the fiber that is created is rayon.
The complaints also allege that these four companies make a number of other “green” claims about their clothing and textile products, none of which are true or substantiated. All four companies claim their products retain the bamboo plant’s antimicrobial properties. The settling companies – Jonäno, Mad Mod, and Pure Bamboo – also claim that their products are made using environmentally-friendly manufacturing processes, and both Pure Bamboo and Bamboosa make unqualified claims that their products are biodegradable, and that they will completely break down and return to the elements found in nature in a reasonably short period of time after customary disposal. Rayon products are not biodegradable because they will not break down in a reasonably short time after customary disposal. Most clothing and textiles are disposed of either by recycling or sending to a landfill. Neither method results in quick biodegradation
Rayon also does not retain any natural antimicrobial properties of the bamboo plant. The rayon manufacturing process, which involves dissolving the plant source in harsh chemicals, eliminates any such natural properties of the bamboo plant.
Remember that while these four companies, knowingly or unknowingly, falsified claims about their bamboo textile products, there are many other companies who do not. So don’t think this makes bamboo-based textile products entirely bad and wholly ‘ungreen’ as they certainly are anything but when compared to other fabrics such as conventionally raised cotton, silk and polyester.
The Good: The FTC is finally calling out some of the most egregious greenwashers in the marketplace and helping to better educate the general public on what to look for when selecting green products.
The Bad: The FTC has still got a very long way to go in addressing the enormous amount of greenwashing going on in the marketplace.
The Bottom-Line: Though the green claims being debunked by the FTC are indeed not true of bamboo-based textiles, there are still a few aspects of bamboo-based textiles that are green and make bamboo a relatively greener fabric choice than say conventionally grown and harvested cotton.
OUR SUSTAINABILITY RATING:
YOUR SUSTAINABILITY RATING:
Related Posts:
Follow us on Twitter and join us on Facebook. While you're at it, subscribe to our feed as well!










Discussion
View Comments for “FTC Blows The Whistle On Bamboo-Based Textiles’ Green Claims”